The Role of University Faculty in Degree Program Sustainability: An Experienced-Based Framework

Abstract

Faculty members play a crucial role in defining “quality education.” Sustainability has received increasing attention in the management of education over the past years. This study focused on the specific role of faculty in the sustainability of degree programs in a State University or College (SUC) and developed an experience-based framework. Hermeneutic phenomenological research design was used in this study. Findings show that the SUC faculty do not have a single role, but instead fulfill many roles that ensure the success of their students. The implementation of flexible teaching within a class dictates an adjustment of the faculty’s role. Such adjustment requires them to possess knowledge not just as educators but as versatile persons. Good teaching implies the preparation of many activities and performance of tasks to ensure that all learners receive quality instruction. Furthermore, it was found that the faculty could be a resource provider, instructional and curriculum specialist, project coordinator, and many other roles. It is concluded that the contribution of the faculty is the most critical success factor in an academic program’s sustainability and development.  
Keywords: Experienced-based Framework, Faculty Role, Program Sustainability, University Faculty

References

Abu Naser, SS., Salama, AM., Al Shobaki, M.J., AlFerjany, AA. M., & Abu Amuna, YM. (2017). The relationship between performance standards and achieving the objectives of supervision at the Islamic University in Gaza.
International Journal of Engineering and Information System, 1 (10), 89-101.

Alvoid, L., & Black Jr, W. L. (2014).The changing role of the principal: How high-achieving districts are recalibrating school leadership. Center for American Progress. https:// www.americanprogress.org/issues/ education/reports/2014/07/01/93015/ thechangin g-role-of-the-principal/

Austin, A. E. (1990). Faculty culture, faculty values. New Directions for Institutional Research. 68.

Beachum, F., & Dentith, A. (2004).Teacher leaders creating cultures of school renewal and transformation. Educational Forum, 68(3), 276-286. DOI: 10.1080/00131720408984639

Biddle, B., & Thomas, E. (1966). Role theory: Concepts and research. John Wiley & Sons.

Blackburn, R.T., & Lawrence, J.H. (1995). Faculty at work: Motivation,
expectation, satisfaction. Johns Hopkins University Press.

Boyer, E. (1990). Scholarship reconsidered, priorities of the professoriate. The Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching.

Camblin, L.D., & Steger, J.A. (2000). Rethinking faculty development. Higher Education, 39(1), 1-18.

Canales, M., Tejeda-Delgado, C., & Slate, J.R. (2010). Superintendents/Principals in small rural school districts: A qualitative study of dual roles. International Journal of Educational Leadership Preparation, 5(1), 1-10.

Chapple, S., & Rackliff, J. (2013). Facilitated dialogues with Office of Adolescent Health Pregnancy Assistance Fund grantees.

Cotton, K. (2003). Principals and student achievement: What the research says. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Crawford-Ferre, H. G., & Wiest, L. R. (2012). Effective online instruction in higher education. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 13(1), 11-14.

Crow, M. (2007). None dare call it hubris: The limits of knowledge. Issues in Science and Technology, 1-4.

Drake, T., & Roe, W. (2002). The principalship. (6th ed). Merrill Prentice Hall.
Duke, C. (2008). University engagement: Avoidable confusion and inescapable contradiction. Higher Education Management and Policy, 20(2), 87-97.

Fichter, K., & I. Tiemann, (2018). Factors influencing university support for
sustainable entrepreneurship: Insights from explorative case studies, Journal of Cleaner Production, 175, 512-524.

Freidus, H. (2002). Teacher education faculty as supervisors/advisors/ facilitators: Playing multiple roles in the construction of field work experiences. Teacher Education Quarterly, 29(2), 65–76. http://www. jstor.org/stable/23478292

Gaff, J.G., & Simpson, R.D. (1994). Faculty development in the United States.
Innovative Higher Education, 18(3), 167-176.

Goddard, J. (2007). Supporting the contribution of HEIs to regional revelopment: Outcomes of the OECD review project of 14 regions in 12 countries. Paper presented at the OECD/IMHE Conference, Valencia, Spain, 19-21 September 2007.

Green, M. F., & Shoenberg, R. (2006).
Where faculty live: Internationalizing the disciplines. American Council on Education

Harris, A. (2007). Distributed leadership: Conceptual confusion and empirical reticence. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 10(3) 315-325. DOI:10.1080/13603120701257313

Harrison, C., & Killion, J. (2007). Ten roles for teacher leaders. Leading professional learning: Building capacity through teacher leaders. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Hubbard, G.T., & Atkins, S.S. (n.d.) The professor as a person: The role of faculty well-being in faculty development. Innovative Higher Education, 20(2), 117-128.


Jacob, W. et al. (2015). Social cartographyof community engagement in higher education. Community Education in Higher Education International and Local Perspectives

Jeschke, S. (2014). Higher education 4.0- Trends and future perspectives for teaching and learning. 64. DHV- Tag Virtuelle Lernwelten in der Universitat, Frankfurt Am Main,

Johnson, K., Hays, C., Center, H., & Daley,C. (2004). Building capacity and sustainable prevention innovations: A sustainability planning model. Evaluation and Program Planning, 27(2), 135-149.
Katzenmeyer, M., & Moller, G. (2001).Awakening the sleeping giant: Helping teachers develop as leaders (2nd ed.). Corwin Press.

Kwiek, M. (2016). The European research elite: A cross-national study of highly productive academics in 11 countries. Higher Education, 71(3), 379-397. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10734-015- 9910-x

Leal Filho, W, S., Raath, B., Lazzarini, V.R., Vargas, L., de Souza, R., Anholon, O.L.G., Quelhas, R., Haddad, M., Klavins, V.L., & Orlovic. (2018). The role of transformation in learning and education for sustainability. Journal of Cleaner Production, 199(286-295).

Lederman, D. (2010). Setting quality standards in higher ed. https://www. insidehighered.com/views/2010/09/09/ setting-quality-standards-higher-ed.

Limoges, J., Jagos, K., Lankshear, S., Madorin, S., & Witmer, D. (2018).
Getting to the root of it: How do faculty address professional
boundaries, role expansion, and intra- professional collaboration?
Journalof Nursing Education and Practice. https://doi.org/10.5430/jnep.v8n9p113

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (2000). Handbook of qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Loder, T., & Spillane, J. (2005). Is a principal still a teacher? US women administrators’ accounts of role conflict and role discontinuity. School Leadership & Management, 25(3), 263- 279. doi:10.1080/13634230500116348

Lozano, R., K., Ceulemans, M., Alonso- Almeida, D., Huisingh, F.J., Lozano, T., Waas, W., Lambrechts, R., Lukman, J., & Hugé. (2015). A review of commitment and implementation of sustainable development in higher education: results from a worldwide survey. Journal of Cleaner Production, 108, 1-18

Majid, A. (2014). Pembelajaran Tematik Terpadu. Bandung, PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Marzano, R., Waters, T., & Mc Nulty, B. (2005). School leadership that works: From research to results. Creative Education, 12(5).

OECD & World Bank. (2007). Cross- border tertiary education: A way towards capacity development. https:// www.oecd.org/education/innovation- education/cross-bordertertiaryeducat ionawaytowardscapacitydevelopment. html

OECD. (2016), Innovating education and educating for innovation: The power of digital technologies and skills, OECD Publishing, Paris. http://dx.doi. org/10.1787/9789264265097-en

Owens, R. G., & Valesky, T.C. (2007).Organizational behavior in education:Adaptive leadership and school reform (9th ed). Pearson Education.

Sahin, M., & Aklan, R.M. (2016). Yuksekogretimde degisim donusum sureci ve universitelerin genisleyen roller. Egitim ve Ogretim Arastirmalari Dergisi, 5(2), 297-307.

Simsek, T. (2017). Endustri 4.0 ile Gelecege Bakis ve Beklentiler. Retrieved from http://www.endustri40.com/endustri- 4-0-ile-gelecege-bakis-ve-beklentiler/

Schuster, J.H. (1990). Enhancing faculty careers: Strategies for development and renewal. ERIC.

Scott, W., Lemus, D., Knotts, G., & Oh, J. (2016). Why learner-centered new faculty orientations matter: Organizational culture and faculty retention. The Journal of Faculty Development, 30(1), 15-22.

Smith, D. (1997). Phenomenology: Methodology and method. In J. Higgs (Ed.), Qualitative research: Discourse on methodologies. Hampden Press.
Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education- Re-visioning learning and change. Green Books for the Schumacher Society.

Sterling, S, L., Maxey, H., & Luna (Eds.). (2013). The sustainable university: Progress and prospects. Routledge.

Storey, V. A., & Johnson, J. (2017). Out over their skis: A study of principal preparation program policy in Florida. Education Leadership, 18(1), 1-20.

Tobi A.S., & Duque, S., (2015). Approaches to quality assurance and accreditation in higher education: A comparison between the Sultanate of Oman and the Philippines. Perspectives of Innovations,Economics & Busines, 15(1), 41- 48. http://dx.doi.org/10.15208/ pieb.2015.03

Varonism, E. M. (2014). Most courses are not born digital: An overview of the quality matters peer review process for online course design. Campus-Wide Information Systems, 31(4), 217–229.

Velez, E. (2015). Administration and faculty: How relationships create and solve the problems. Journal of Applied Learning Technology, 5(4), 37-40.

Zeiger, S. (2014). Raising content kids.United States: CreateSpace Publishing
Published
2022-12-13