Multidimensional Gender Equity Index

Abstract

The main objective of this study was to establish an index of gender equity that involved the development of indicators of equity in different situations. Specifically, it aimed to determine the gender gaps in tertiary education, work employment opportunity, household and community involvement. There were 1000 respondents used in this study. It was designed to be descriptive and normative. Based on the data gathered, it was revealed that age, gender, civil status, occupation and income earners significantly influence household in terms of chores and parenting. It showed that the tasks or jobs of the household members vary. An older member of the family is perceived to be more responsible and already capable of keeping the house clean and in order. Further, in decision-making, the ideas of the oldest family member are more acceptable and most of the time followed by the other members. Therefore, gender inequity is very much observable in this dimension. The indices such as chores and parenting showed that the members of the family do not have an equal share and opportunities in the household. However, gender equity in education, work employment, and community involvement is most evident.
Keywords: Multidimensional, gender equity index, weighting factors, education, work employment, household

References

Bailey, S. (1993). The current status of gender equity research in American schools. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Bank, B., & Hall, P. (1997). Gender, equity and schooling: Policy and practice. University of Missouri.

International Labor Organization (ILO). (2000). ABC of women’s rights and gender equality. Retrieved from www. unfpa.org

International Labor Organization. Gender equality at workplace. Retrieved from http://www.ge4de.org

Equality Act. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.makingequalityreal.org.uk

Gender Equality. (2012). Progress in gender equality leads to economic growth. Retrieved from ec.europa.eu

Gender and Decentralization: Promoting women’s participation in local councils. Retrieved from www.fao.org./docrep/003/x6090e06.htm

Jung, K., & Chung, H. (2005). Gender equality in classroom instruction: Introducing gender training for teachers in the Republic of Korea. Retrieved from www2.unescobkk.org/elib/publications/078/gender.pdf

La Pierre, Tracy, A., & Zimmerman, M.K. (2012). Gender in management: An International Journal, 27, (2). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Muelau, P. (2011). Academic journal article from Management Review, 22 (2).

Obura, A., & Wamahiu, S. (2011). Gender equality in education: Looking beyond parity. Global Literature Review on Gender Equality in Educational Planning and Management.

Parcheta, Kaifi, & Khanfar. (2013). Gender inequality in the workforce: A human resource quandary. Journal of Business Studies Quarterly, 4 (3).

Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2011). The gender pay gap in top corporate jobs in Denmark-Glass ceilings or sticky floors or both? International Journal of Manpower.

Steinpreis, R.E., Anders, K.A., & Ritzke, D. (1999). The impact of gender on the review of the curricula vitae of job applicants and tenure candidates: A national empirical study. University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee.

Social Watch. (2012). Gender equity index. Retrieved from www.socialwatch.org

Schwab, K. (2010). World Economic Forum (2010). Global gender gap. Retrieved from http://www.weforum.org

United Nations Fund for Population Activities (UNFPA). 2005. Retrieved from www.ilo.org/wcmsp5/groups/public/---dgreports/---gender/documents/publication/wcms_087314.pdf

Zahidi, S. (2006). The global gender gap report 2006. World Economic Forum. Geneva, Switzerland. Multidimensional Gender Equity Index
Published
2017-05-25

Most read articles by the same author(s)